[Met_help] FW: Stat_Analysis

[John Halley Gotway]

Bob,

I took a look at the files you sent, and I see what's going on.  It looks
like it was just a poor choice of MODEL name when you ran Grid-Stat.  You
chose the model name "LIS Q-MORPH" with an embedded space.

It ran through Grid-Stat fine, but when STAT-Analysis parses that STAT
data it gets confused by the embedded space.  I tried changing that model
name to "LISQ-MORPH" in the data you sent, and rerunning a STAT-Analysis
job, and it worked fine.

I'm surprised Grid-Stat allowed you to use a MODEL name with an embedded
space.  I thought it was checking for embedded whitespace and erroring out
if it found any.

I'll take a closer look at that.

Hope that solves the problem.

Thanks,
John

>
>
> John, until I can get the GUI figured out, I have been trying to do this
> via
> command line, and not having much luck.  The configuration file is
> attached.
>
>
>
> The command line to kick it off is:
> /sphome/qcteam/METv2.0/bin/stat_analysis
> -lookin /sphome/qcteam/METv2.0/out/grid_stat/LIS -config
> /sphome/qcteam/METv2.0/scripts/config/STATAnalysisConfig_LIS
>
>
>
> Also attached are the data files. I didn't include the nc files since they
> were 11 mb each.   I ran verification of APCP for a four day period. I had
> to rename the zip file to met_data.dat to get it past our firewall.
>
>
>
> Below is the typical error message a get:
>
>
>
> Creating STAT output file "../out/stat_analysis/job_aggregate_SL1L2.stat"
>
> WARNING: do_job_aggr_stat() -> no matching STAT lines found for job: -job
> aggregate_stat -model LIS -fcst_lead 030000 -fcst_valid_beg 20
>
> 100301_000000 -fcst_valid_end 20100304_000000 -fcst_init_hour 000000
> -fcst_var APCP/3 -fcst_lev SFC -obs_lev SFC -alpha 0.000000 -line_t
>
> ype FHO -dump_row ../out/stat_analysis/job_aggregate_SL1L2.stat
> -out_line_type CTS -out_alpha 0.050000
>
>
>
> I have tried a lot of different options and combinations but I can't get
> past this error.  The verification files are in the proper directory
> (lookin
> above)
>
>
>
> Again, what have I done wrong?
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Bob
>
>