[Go-essp-tech] The geospatial and temporal coverage in THREDDS catalogs

[Nebojsa Balic]

  On 07/20/2011 12:04 PM, Ashish Bhardwaj wrote:
> Hi Nebojsa,
>
> At IPSL data node, current esgcet version is 2.8.0.
>
> I also have not changed anything related to aggregation configuration 
> other than enabling the OpenDAP service for aggregations in the 
> esg.ini file.
>
>
> Ashish
>
>
> stephen.pascoe at stfc.ac.uk wrote:
>> Nebojsa,
>>
>> ESG publisher creates this THREDDS content automatically and I 
>> haven't tried to change anything.  I haven't done anything to the 
>> aggregation configuration other than enabling the OpenDAP service for 
>> aggregations in the esg.ini file.  I haven't even looked at temporal 
>> coverage.
>>
>> Therefore any variation between IPSL and us is probably due to 
>> differing versions of esgpublisher or a configuration change at 
>> IPSL.  We are using esgcet==2.7.6 but some THREDDS catalogues will 
>> have been made by an earlier version.
>>
>>> The aggregations are in the BADC catalogs given on the level of 
>>> normal chunks whereas by IPSL they reside under separate folder.
>>
>> I don't understand this statement.  If you can give a precise example 
>> I could investigate.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Stephen.
>>
>> ---
>> Stephen Pascoe  +44 (0)1235 445980
>> Centre of Environmental Data Archival
>> STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Harwell Oxford, Didcot OX11 0QX, UK
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: go-essp-tech-bounces at ucar.edu 
>> [mailto:go-essp-tech-bounces at ucar.edu] On Behalf Of Nebojsa Balic
>> Sent: 20 July 2011 09:28
>> To: go-essp-tech at ucar.edu
>> Subject: [Go-essp-tech] The geospatial and temporal coverage in 
>> THREDDS catalogs
>>
>>    Dear Stephen,
>> In the course of regular harvesting of THREDDS catalogs, I have 
>> noticed certain irregularities in terms of the structure of the 
>> catalogs varying from datanode to datanode. These relate to the 
>> geospatial and temporal coverage elements that appear mainly in the 
>> aggregations. The aggregations are in the BADC catalogs given on the 
>> level of normal chunks whereas by IPSL they reside under separate 
>> folder. Is there any general agreement in terms of where these 
>> elements should appear in the catalogs? I would also like to ask if 
>> the geospatial coverage of an aggregation  represents the geospatial 
>> coverage of the chaunks related to this aggregation?
>> Thanking in advance
>> Nebojsa Balic
>> MPI-M
>> Hamburg
>> _______________________________________________
>> GO-ESSP-TECH mailing list
>> GO-ESSP-TECH at ucar.edu
>> http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/go-essp-tech
>
>
Hi Ashish and Stephen,
Is there going to be an agreement on the version which will be used by 
all data nodes?
Regards
Nebojsa