[Go-essp-tech] The geospatial and temporal coverage in THREDDS catalogs
Nebojsa Balic
balic at dkrz.de
Wed Jul 20 04:21:19 MDT 2011
On 07/20/2011 12:04 PM, Ashish Bhardwaj wrote:
> Hi Nebojsa,
>
> At IPSL data node, current esgcet version is 2.8.0.
>
> I also have not changed anything related to aggregation configuration
> other than enabling the OpenDAP service for aggregations in the
> esg.ini file.
>
>
> Ashish
>
>
> stephen.pascoe at stfc.ac.uk wrote:
>> Nebojsa,
>>
>> ESG publisher creates this THREDDS content automatically and I
>> haven't tried to change anything. I haven't done anything to the
>> aggregation configuration other than enabling the OpenDAP service for
>> aggregations in the esg.ini file. I haven't even looked at temporal
>> coverage.
>>
>> Therefore any variation between IPSL and us is probably due to
>> differing versions of esgpublisher or a configuration change at
>> IPSL. We are using esgcet==2.7.6 but some THREDDS catalogues will
>> have been made by an earlier version.
>>
>>> The aggregations are in the BADC catalogs given on the level of
>>> normal chunks whereas by IPSL they reside under separate folder.
>>
>> I don't understand this statement. If you can give a precise example
>> I could investigate.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Stephen.
>>
>> ---
>> Stephen Pascoe +44 (0)1235 445980
>> Centre of Environmental Data Archival
>> STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Harwell Oxford, Didcot OX11 0QX, UK
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: go-essp-tech-bounces at ucar.edu
>> [mailto:go-essp-tech-bounces at ucar.edu] On Behalf Of Nebojsa Balic
>> Sent: 20 July 2011 09:28
>> To: go-essp-tech at ucar.edu
>> Subject: [Go-essp-tech] The geospatial and temporal coverage in
>> THREDDS catalogs
>>
>> Dear Stephen,
>> In the course of regular harvesting of THREDDS catalogs, I have
>> noticed certain irregularities in terms of the structure of the
>> catalogs varying from datanode to datanode. These relate to the
>> geospatial and temporal coverage elements that appear mainly in the
>> aggregations. The aggregations are in the BADC catalogs given on the
>> level of normal chunks whereas by IPSL they reside under separate
>> folder. Is there any general agreement in terms of where these
>> elements should appear in the catalogs? I would also like to ask if
>> the geospatial coverage of an aggregation represents the geospatial
>> coverage of the chaunks related to this aggregation?
>> Thanking in advance
>> Nebojsa Balic
>> MPI-M
>> Hamburg
>> _______________________________________________
>> GO-ESSP-TECH mailing list
>> GO-ESSP-TECH at ucar.edu
>> http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/go-essp-tech
>
>
Hi Ashish and Stephen,
Is there going to be an agreement on the version which will be used by
all data nodes?
Regards
Nebojsa
More information about the GO-ESSP-TECH
mailing list