[Go-essp-tech] New DRS structure

[martin.juckes at stfc.ac.uk]

Control vocabularies have not changed -- though I think we need some clarification in the DRS document. The current document says that DRS component names will not contain and underscore, but CMOR2 implementation combines the variable name and the MIP table to build a "variable_id" name using an underscore. The clarification here is to indicate in some way that "variable_id" is a compound component containing a single underscore. 

Regards,
Martin

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Morgan (CDD denvil) [mailto:Mark.Morgan at ipsl.jussieu.fr]
> Sent: 08 September 2010 09:39
> To: Juckes, Martin (STFC,RAL,SSTD)
> Cc: estanislao.gonzalez at zmaw.de; go-essp-tech at ucar.edu
> Subject: Re: [Go-essp-tech] New DRS structure
> 
> Martin
> 
> Can you please confirm that DRS controlled vocabularies have not
> changed?
> 
> Regards
> 
> Mark
> 
> 
> > Hello Estani,
> >
> > I would phrase this slightly differently. The DRS consists of a set
> of
> > controlled vocabularies and a set of uses. The CMOR directory
> structure
> > will still be in the new DRS document as the CMOR directory
> structure, and
> > what you describe below will be in there as the data node directory
> > structure with the exception that "variable" would be replaced with
> > "variable_id", where "variable_id" is a combination of variable name
> and
> > MIP table. As you note in a subsequent email, the DRS does not say
> how
> > these two should be combined, but CMOR2 combines them with an
> underscore
> > so I believe we should adopt the same approach for the data note
> directory
> > names.
> >
> > I think Stephen may be working on a more detailed review of the
> decisions
> > -- as you note, the DRS document will need revising,
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Martin
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: go-essp-tech-bounces at ucar.edu [mailto:go-essp-tech-
> >> bounces at ucar.edu] On Behalf Of Estanislao Gonzalez
> >> Sent: 08 September 2010 08:47
> >> To: go-essp-tech at ucar.edu
> >> Subject: [Go-essp-tech] New DRS structure
> >>
> >> Hello all,
> >>
> >> I'm trying to avoid confusion so I'll try to sum up the new DRS
> >> structure and concepts we agreed upon yesterday.
> >>
> >> The new DRS structure will be:
> >>
> activity/product/institute/model/experiment/frequency/realm/ensemble/ve
> >> rsion/variable
> >>
> >> This structure will be generated by the drslib from cmor's "old" DRS
> >> output.
> >>
> >> The publication dataset level was introduced for the TDS which
> >> involves:
> >> activity/product/institute/model/experiment/frequency/realm/ensemble
> >>
> >> Both catalog and directory (DRS) versions are equal.
> >>
> >> Please amend any errors you see.
> >>
> >> Any plan for amending the DRS document?
> >> I suggest at least deleting the link to the old one as it isn't
> valid
> >> anymore.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Estani
> >>
> >> --
> >> Estanislao Gonzalez
> >>
> >> Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie (MPI-M)
> >> Deutsches Klimarechenzentrum (DKRZ) - German Climate Computing
> Centre
> >> Room 108 - Bundesstrasse 45a, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany
> >>
> >> Phone:   +49 (40) 46 00 94-126
> >> E-Mail:  estanislao.gonzalez at zmaw.de
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> GO-ESSP-TECH mailing list
> >> GO-ESSP-TECH at ucar.edu
> >> http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/go-essp-tech
> > --
> > Scanned by iCritical.
> > _______________________________________________
> > GO-ESSP-TECH mailing list
> > GO-ESSP-TECH at ucar.edu
> > http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/go-essp-tech
> >
> >