[cam-users] CGD Forums
phpbb at cgd.ucar.edu
phpbb at cgd.ucar.edu
Mon Nov 1 09:00:00 MST 2004
Dear cam-users,
As you requested, here is the latest digest of messages posted on CGD Forums forums. Please come and join the discussion!
<< undefined reference to `history_mp_fincllonlat_', http://bb.cgd.ucar.edu//viewtopic.php?t=41 >>
PosterjPPostedMon Nov 01, 2004 6:13 am MST, http://bb.cgd.ucar.edu//viewtopic.php?p=118#118
Message: Hi All.
<br />
<br />I'm a novice CAM user and I'm trying to get CAM3 compiled on Itanium. While linking I receive *undefined reference to `history_mp_fincllonlat_'* from intel fortran 8.1. (Package ID: l_fce_pc_8.1.023).
<br />
<br />More precisely:
<br />
<br />runtime_opts.o(.text+0xa3c9): In function `preset':
<br />~/work/cam1/models/atm/cam/src/control/runtime_opts.F90:1609: undefined reference to `history_mp_fincllonlat_'
<br />make: *** Error 1
<br />
<br />
<br />'nm' tells me there is no history_mp_fincllonlat_ in the history.o file.
<br />This is quite a strange situation because in history.F90 I found
<br />
<br />character(len=10) :: fincl(pflds,ptapes)
<br />character(len=max_chars) :: fincllonlat(pflds,ptapes)
<br />character(len=8 ) :: fexcl(pflds,ptapes)
<br />character(len=10) :: fhstpr(pflds,ptapes)
<br />character(len=10) :: fwrtpr(pflds,ptapes)
<br />
<br />What is more strange I have to arrays
<br />
<br />character(len=10) :: fincl(pfl!
ds,ptapes)
<br />character(len=max_chars) :: fincllonlat(pflds,ptapes)
<br />
<br />defined almost the same way. Both have equivalence statement in the same file
<br />...
<br />character(len=max_chars) fincl1lonlat(pflds)
<br />equivalence (fincl1lonlat,fincllonlat(1,1))
<br />...
<br />character*10 fincl1(pflds)
<br />equivalence (fincl1,fincl(1,1))
<br />...
<br />
<br />but one array is defined and the other is not:
<br />> nm history.o | grep fincl
<br />00000000006afddc C history_mp_fincl_
<br />00000000006f8292 C history_mp_fincl1lonlat_
<br />
<br />I don't know, maybe this is a problem with *equivalence* or something. Does anyone know the correct answer? :)
<br />Thanx!
------------------------------
<< radiation calculation, http://bb.cgd.ucar.edu//viewtopic.php?t=31 >>
Postercathryn.meyer at yale.eduPostedMon Nov 01, 2004 2:26 pm MST, http://bb.cgd.ucar.edu//viewtopic.php?p=119#119
Message: The SWCF and LWCF were nonzero after I replaced cld with zero in the code tphysbc.F90. Would setting cldmin>1.0 in the codes RADCSWMX and RADCLWMX have the effect of not allowing the radiation code to see the clouds? Would this affect the way the model sees the clouds at all?
<br />
<br />Thanks,
<br />Cathy
------------------------------
Format TEXT
Show Message Text YES
Show My Messages YES
Digest Frequency DAY
Show only new messages since last time I logged in FALSE
Send empty digests NO
Time of day to send digest 9 AM
Maximum characters per message in digest 32000
More information about the cam-users
mailing list