thank you very much<br><br>At 2017-09-18 23:35:05, "CARLOS ROMAN CASCON" <carlosromancascon@ucm.es> wrote:<br> <blockquote id="isReplyContent" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid"><div dir="ltr">Dear Tian, <div><br></div><div>WRF gives you directly the QCLOUD output, which is LWC. </div><div><br></div><div>Cheers!</div><div><br></div><div>Carlos</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2017-09-17 18:43 GMT+02:00 Tian Meng <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:tianm08xxs@163.com" target="_blank">tianm08xxs@163.com</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style="line-height:1.7;color:#000000;font-size:14px;font-family:Arial"><pre style="line-height:normal">Hello, thank you for reading my email.
When I want to process a fog case experiment using WRF model , I have a problem demanding your guide: I can't find LWC(liquid water content) from WRF output variables. Or it may need extra calculation by other variables? If so, Could you help me to know that mehtod ?
<div>Thanks and best regards.</div><div>tianmeng</div></pre></div><br><br><span title="neteasefooter"><p> </p></span><br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Wrf-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Wrf-users@ucar.edu">Wrf-users@ucar.edu</a><br>
<a href="http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/wrf-users" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mailman.ucar.edu/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/wrf-users</wbr></a><br>
<br></wbr></blockquote></div><br></div>
</blockquote><br><br><span title="neteasefooter"><div id="netease_mail_footer"><div style="border-top:#CCC 1px solid;padding:10px 5px;font-size:17px;color:#777;line-height:22px"><a href="http://you.163.com/item/detail?id=1165011&from=web_gg_mail_jiaobiao_9" target="_blank" style="color:#3366FF;text-decoration:none">【网易自营|30天无忧退货】仅售同款价1/4！MUJI制造商“2017秋冬舒适家居拖鞋系列”限时仅34.9元>>  </a>
    </div></div></span>