<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal">Hi all,<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
I had a question about wrf and compiler/machine differences that I was hoping to get some clarity on. I am trying to run the same set of wps/wrf compiled executables on two different machines (the libraries for the machine in which the .exe’s were not compiled
on were placed in the exact same location as those on the machine in which the .exe’s were configured/compiled on, hence they run just fine). So essentially, the only difference is the actual machine hardware being used.
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">For metgrid.exe and real.exe, the results between the two machines are identical, however even with identical met_ems and wrfinput/wrfbdy files, the wrf results are different. By day 58 or so the average differences in TA and especially
precipitation, are quite large (on the order of 1-2mm/day). I am trying to run this over Southeast Asia where there is a lot of cumulus convection. But, I wanted to check if this is to be expected to observe such large differences? I did do a quick internet
and forum search but couldn’t find specific work documenting this. And, I wanted to see if there was a way in the compiling of the code (via a flag, etc that one can add) to get identical results across machines or even compilers? I ask because what is interesting
is that running an identical CCSM.exe on the two machines will yield identical CAM results on the two different machines.
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
Any help or insight you could lend would be greatly appreciated.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
Thanks,<br>
Marc<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>