<div dir="ltr"><div><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px;border-collapse:collapse">Hello, you can use the same parametrization for all domains, that is not a problem, but for question 2, based in modeling experience (experiences by MSC. Brandt Maxwell form NOAA) you dont have improvements including cumulus parametrization with dx < 4 km. </span></div>
<div><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px;border-collapse:collapse"><br></span></div><div><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px;border-collapse:collapse">Juan José Amides Figueroa Urbano</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px;border-collapse:collapse">Servicio Meteorológico Nacional<br>Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (MARN)<br>Tel: (503) 2132-9544<br><br><span style="border-collapse:separate;font-family:arial;font-size:small">jn 3:16</span></span></div>
<div dir="ltr"><font face="arial, sans-serif"><br></font></div><br>
<div dir="ltr"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 6:00 PM, <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:wrf-users-request@ucar.edu" target="_blank">wrf-users-request@ucar.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Question regarding physical parameterization (wei huang)</blockquote></div><br></div></div>