Hi, 2,048 is no problem. I invite you to look at our benchmarking page<div><br></div><div><a href="http://weather.arsc.edu/WRFBenchmarking/">http://weather.arsc.edu/WRFBenchmarking/</a></div><div><br></div><div>for some test cases, and we'd enjoy getting your results.</div>
<div><br></div><div>I've used 10,000 cores, and at the level, the limitation is that the rsl.* files only have four digits for the task number, so you need to go into the code and change that. </div><div><br></div><div>
Cheers,</div><div><br></div><div>Don Morton</div><div><div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><br></div>-- <br><div>Voice: +1 907 450 8679</div>Arctic Region Supercomputing Center<br><a href="http://weather.arsc.edu/" target="_blank">http://weather.arsc.edu/</a><div>
<a href="http://www.arsc.edu/~morton/" target="_blank">http://people.arsc.edu/~morton/</a></div><div><br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 12:12 AM, brick <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:brickflying@gmail.com">brickflying@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi All<div><br></div><div>Is there a limit of core number that WRF could use? I plan test WRF with 2048 cores or more next week. Could WRF run with such huge number?</div>
<div>Thanks a lot.</div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><div><br></div><div>brick</div>
</font></span><br>_______________________________________________<br>
Wrf-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Wrf-users@ucar.edu">Wrf-users@ucar.edu</a><br>
<a href="http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/wrf-users" target="_blank">http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/wrf-users</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br><br>
</div>