<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Dear WRF Help and Users,</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">We bought new SGI cluster and I transferred
all WRF versions and jobs from old SGI cluster on a new one.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">After installation of WRF on new SGI
cluster I ran several trial jobs for WRFv2.2, WWRFv3.0 and WRFv3.1</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">to be sure that WRF output is completely
consistent with WRF output from the old SGI cluster.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Configuration of both clusters is the
same and I used 1cpu and multi-cpu WRF trials to check that </font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">both clusters produce the same results.
</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">I've got exactly the same results for
WRFv2.2 and WRFv3.0 and was very surprised to receive very</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">close (correlation coefficient about
0.99) but still different results for WRFv3.1 (for 1 cpu and for multi-cpu
runs)</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">on a new cluster via the old one.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">WRFv3.1 has the same configuration for
old and new SGIs, the same 'namlist.input' and LANDUSE and VEGPAR tables.</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Also the input terrestrial files (height
and landuse) and input synoptic files are the same.</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">But for WRFv3.1 I still have a bit different
results on old and new SGI clusters.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Has anyone got such a problem before
and why does it happen with WRFv3.1 only?</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">I have no logical explanation to this
difference between 2 SGIs with exactly the same software (WRFv3.1 only).</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Any help is highly appreciable.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Thanks a lot,</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Michael<br>
</font><font size=2 color=#8f8f8f face="Arial"><b>________________________________________________________________________________</b></font>
<br><font size=2 color=#8f8f8f face="Arial"><b> </b></font>
<br><font size=2 color=#8f8f8f face="Arial"><b>Dr. Mikhail Titov |</b></font><font size=2 face="Arial"><b>
Energy </b></font><font size=2 color=#8f8f8f face="Arial"><b>|</b></font><font size=2 color=#0060a0 face="Arial"><b>
Aurecon </b></font>
<br><font size=2 color=#8f8f8f face="Arial"><b>Ph: +64 3 366 0821 ext.9231
DDI +64 367 32 31 | Fax: +64 3 379 6955 | Mob: +64 21 106 5563 </b></font>
<br><font size=2 color=#8f8f8f face="Arial"><b>Email:</b></font><font size=2 color=#0060a0 face="Arial"><b>
TitovM@ap.aurecongroup.com </b></font>
<br><font size=2 color=#8f8f8f face="Arial"><b>PO Box 1061, 122 Gloucester
Street | Christchurch 8140 | New Zealand </b></font>
<br><font size=2 color=#8f8f8f face="Arial"><b>http://www.aurecongroup.com</b></font>
<br><font size=1 color=#8f8f8f face="Arial">http://www.aurecongroup.com/apac/groupentity/</font><font size=2 color=#8f8f8f face="Arial">
<b> </b></font>
<br><font size=2 color=#8f8f8f face="Arial"><b>________________________________________________________________________________</b></font>
<br><font size=2 color=#8f8f8f face="Arial"> </font>
<br><font size=2 color=#008000 face="Arial">Please consider your environment
before printing this e-mail.</font><font size=3 face="sans-serif"><br>
</font>
<br><font size=1 face="sans-serif"><br>
<br>
</font>
<p><font size=1 face="sans-serif"><br>
Disclaimer - http://www.aurecongroup.com/apac/disclaimer/ </font>
<p><font size=3 face="sans-serif"><br>
</font>
<br>
<br>