[Wrf-users] frames_per_auxhist, is there a limit of 10000 ???

[Kevin Matthew Nuss]

H Elena,

Hope the delay does not make this useless, but I found the following code
in wrf_io.F90:

module wrf_data

  integer                , parameter      :: FATAL            = 1
  integer                , parameter      :: WARN             = 1
  integer                , parameter      :: WrfDataHandleMax = 99
  integer                , parameter      :: MaxDims          = 2000 ! =
NF_MAX_VARS
  integer                , parameter      :: MaxVars          = 3000
*  integer                , parameter      :: MaxTimes         = 10000*
  integer                , parameter      :: DateStrLen       = 19
  integer                , parameter      :: VarNameLen       = 31
  integer                , parameter      :: NO_DIM           = 0
  integer                , parameter      :: NVarDims         = 4
  integer                , parameter      :: NMDVarDims       = 2
  character (8)          , parameter      :: NO_NAME          = 'NULL'
  character (DateStrLen) , parameter      :: ZeroDate =
'0000-00-00-00:00:00'

I think that confirms what you found the hard way. And perhaps you can
change this and get what you want ( but only another trial would prove
that).
Kevin



On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 12:28 AM, Elena Maria Pison San Pedro <
emp at dhigroup.com> wrote:

>   Attachments: Size    namelist-rsl.zip<https://bluewhale.dk.dhigroup.com/rs?key=sZMabybmk6GkvRyywb3AsXAGdCS39yDR&zIStart=0&zIStop=0> 6
> Mb  *Download all<https://bluewhale.dk.dhigroup.com/rs?key=sZMabybmk6GkvRyywb3AsXAGdCS39yDR>
> * *6 Mb*
>
> *Download until October 2, 2013.*
>
> The attached files have been scanned and found virus free.
>   Return a large file<https://bluewhale.dk.dhigroup.com/va?key=sZMabybmk6GkvRyywb3AsXAGdCS39yDR> Powered
> by Bluewhale <http://www.bluewhale.dk>
> ------------------------------
>
> Hi,****
>
> ** **
>
> I’ve discovered that in the auxiliary outputs I’m losing some data as I’ve
> set *frames_per_auxhist24 = 12 000* for domain d02 and it only prints
> till 9999. ****
>
> In the log file, it says that is printing but when I look into the next
> file (which really starts after 12000) then the difference between 9999 and
> 12000 is lost.****
>
> ** **
>
> The output file was 1.4 Mb and I’ve settled the WRFIO_NCD_FILE_SUPPORT =1
> so It can’t be the size limitation..****
>
> ** **
>
> I’ve tried to look into the registry files but I haven’t found any
> limitation to this variable.****
>
> ** **
>
> Can you confirm me is this variable has a limit of 10 000 times per
> ouputfile or if I should look for another reason?****
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks so much in advance!****
>
> ** **
>
> Kind Regards,****
>
> Elena****
>
> ** **
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wrf-users mailing list
> Wrf-users at ucar.edu
> http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/wrf-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ucar.edu/pipermail/wrf-users/attachments/20130922/e9b147dd/attachment.html