[Wrf-users] perturbation potential temperature
Agnes Mika
agnes.mika at bmtargoss.com
Mon Sep 6 01:29:30 MDT 2010
Hallo Liu,
The conversion is quite simple. The formula to convert perturbation
potential temperature to total potential temperature in K can be
found in the WRF users manual (p. 5-58 in the July 2009 edition,
under section "WRF Output Fields", sub-section "Special WRF Output
Variables) and it reads:
Total pot. temp. in K = T + 300 (T is the perturbation pot. temp.)
The forumla to convert total potential temperature to "normal"
temperature can be found in virtually any meteorology book. The
potential temperature is the temperature a parcel of air having a
certain pressure p and temperature ("normal" temp.) would attain if
brought dry adiabatically to a standard pressure p_0 (this is usually
taken to be 1000 mbar). The conversion formula is:
pot. temp. = "normal" temp. * (p_0/p)^kappa
From this: "normal" temp. = pot. temp. * (p/p_0)^kappa
p_0 = 1000 mbar
p is the pressure in mbar
kappa is the Poisson constant (kappa = R/c_p), the ratio of the gas
constant R to the specific heat at constant pressure c_p. For dry air
kappa = 0.2854.
Hope this helps,
Agnes
Liu, Peng wrote:
> Dear Users,
> I ran two data set by WRF and want to compare the predicted temperature. The output temperature of WRF is perturbation potential temperature, So I have a few questions.
>
> First, how WRF sets the reference sea level temperature? I mean if reference sea level temperature keeps the same when WRF deals with different data set?
>
> Second, for two different data sets, if WRF keeps sea level temperature the same , and at the same time, top of pressure and the vertical layers are set to be the same, Does that mean the reference potential temperature for each vertical levels are the same for the two data set, and when I want to compare predicted temperature, I can directly compare the perturbation potential temperature?
>
> Third, If I can not directly compare the perturbation potential temperature to see the difference of predicted temperature, is there any way that I can convert the perturbation potential temperature to absolute temperature?
>
> Thank you very much.
>
> Peng
--
Dr. A'gnes Mika
Advisor, Meteorology and Air Quality
Tel: +31 (0)527-242299
Fax: +31 (0)527-242016
Web: www.bmtargoss.com
BMT ARGOSS
P.O. Box 61, 8325 ZH Vollenhove
Voorsterweg 28, 8316 PT Marknesse
The Netherlands
Confidentiality Notice & Disclaimer
The contents of this e-mail and any attachments are intended for the
use of the mail addressee(s) shown. If you are not that person, you
are not allowed to take any action based upon it or to copy it,
forward, distribute or disclose its contents and you should delete it
from your system. BMT ARGOSS does not accept liability for any errors
or omissions in the context of this e-mail or its attachments which
arise as a result of internet transmission, nor accept liability for
statements which are those of the author and clearly not made on
behalf of BMT ARGOSS.
More information about the Wrf-users
mailing list