<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">Please see the examples on this page:</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style=""><a href="http://www.ncl.ucar.edu/Applications/2Dvertcoord.shtml">http://www.ncl.ucar.edu/Applications/2Dvertcoord.shtml</a><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style=""><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="">If you continue to have problems, I think <a href="mailto:wrfhelp@ucar.edu">wrfhelp@ucar.edu</a> might have some better suggestions on how to use the WRF scripts to get the plot you want.</div><div class="gmail_default" style=""><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="">--Mary</div><div class="gmail_default" style=""><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 11:46 PM, sangeeta maharjan <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:sangeetamaharjan@gmail.com" target="_blank">sangeetamaharjan@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi Mary,<br>
It have been using gsn_csm_xy to plot terrain . The script is in the<br>
attachment.<br>
<br>
After your suggestion, I replaced gsn_csm_xy by gsn_csm_contour but<br>
the plot didnot show any terrain contour (see gsn_csm_contour.png in<br>
the attachment).<br>
<br>
I just replaced " contour_ter =<br>
gsn_csm_xy(wks,X_plane,ter_plane,opts_ter) " with<br>
<br>
" contour_ter = gsn_csm_contour(wks,ter_plane,opts_ter)" in the script.<br>
<br>
Thanks.<br>
<br>
Sang.<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 1:00 AM, Mary Haley <<a href="mailto:haley@ucar.edu">haley@ucar.edu</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> Again, without a script, we can't tell what the problem might be. Your tickmarks are pointing in, which is strange. This seems to indicate that you are plotting your data with gsn_contour, and not gsn_csm_contour.<br>
><br>
> One thing might be to try using gsn_csm_contour, and setting res@gsnYAxisIrregular2Linear = True<br>
><br>
> <a href="http://www.ncl.ucar.edu/Document/Graphics/Resources/gsn.shtml#gsnYAxisIrregular2Linear" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.ncl.ucar.edu/Document/Graphics/Resources/gsn.shtml#gsnYAxisIrregular2Linear</a><br>
><br>
> If you continue to have issues with this, *please* include a script. We might also have to ask for the data.<br>
><br>
> --Mary<br>
><br>
><br>
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 11:39 PM, sangeeta maharjan <<a href="mailto:sangeetamaharjan@gmail.com">sangeetamaharjan@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> Hello Xiaoming and Mary,<br>
>><br>
>> Thanks for your reply.<br>
>> I am aware that it is a west-east cross section plot. I tried but could not add the minor tick marks in vertical axes. The values in ter_plane used in the scripts yields (max value is red in color (21th value)<br>
>><br>
>> Variable: ter_plane<br>
>> Type: float<br>
>> Total Size: 272 bytes<br>
>> 68 values<br>
>> Number of Dimensions: 1<br>
>> Dimensions and sizes: [Horizontal | 68]<br>
>> Coordinates:<br>
>> Number Of Attributes: 3<br>
>> _FillValue : 9.96921e+36<br>
>> units : m<br>
>> description : Terrain Height<br>
>> (0) 537.3745<br>
>> (1) 556.2093<br>
>> (2) 556.2093<br>
>> (3) 552.6631<br>
>> (4) 551.8929<br>
>> (5) 588.4611<br>
>> (6) 640.3762<br>
>> (7) 713.1735<br>
>> (8) 804.7409<br>
>> (9) 854.6913<br>
>> (10) 849.4119<br>
>> (11) 805.8835<br>
>> (12) 763.5001<br>
>> (13) 735.0173<br>
>> (14) 856.4299<br>
>> (15) 1169.83<br>
>> (16) 1492.322<br>
>> (17) 1652.575<br>
>> (18) 1694.905<br>
>> (19) 1765.424<br>
>> (20) 1889.178<br>
>> (21) 1945.099<br>
>> (22) 1869.276<br>
>> (23) 1755.734<br>
>> (24) 1730.924<br>
>> (25) 1704.013<br>
>> (26) 1546.452<br>
>> (27) 1411.18<br>
>> (28) 1363.609<br>
>> (29) 1243.166<br>
>> (30) 1051.444<br>
>> (31) 936.7072<br>
>> (32) 941.271<br>
>> (33) 928.4125<br>
>> (34) 861.8909<br>
>> (35) 960.158<br>
>> (36) 1142.136<br>
>> (37) 1091.726<br>
>> (38) 925.554<br>
>> (39) 876.4838<br>
>> (40) 894.1756<br>
>> (41) 927.5086<br>
>> (42) 1036.723<br>
>> (43) 1188.228<br>
>> (44) 1198.813<br>
>> (45) 1186.619<br>
>> (46) 1269.593<br>
>> (47) 1163.258<br>
>> (48) 913.6985<br>
>> (49) 847.5559<br>
>> (50) 987.7681<br>
>> (51) 1175.981<br>
>> (52) 1240.032<br>
>> (53) 1103.708<br>
>> (54) 881.4406<br>
>> (55) 781.1543<br>
>> (56) 893.9818<br>
>> (57) 1047.922<br>
>> (58) 1127.229<br>
>> (59) 1131.302<br>
>> (60) 1081.057<br>
>> (61) 976.4305<br>
>> (62) 924.3822<br>
>> (63) 904.832<br>
>> (64) 861.3491<br>
>> (65) 830.9657<br>
>> (66) 798.5671<br>
>> (67) 748.0306<br>
>><br>
>> With reference to plot in the attachment, the temperature contour left and right of maximum peak is close to 1500 m so i fell that the the terrain height is reduced by some hundreds.<br>
>><br>
>> Regards<br>
>> Sang.<br>
>><br>
>> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 8:47 PM, xiaoming Hu <<a href="mailto:yuanfangcan@hotmail.com">yuanfangcan@hotmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>>><br>
>>> I don't see anything wrong with your plot.<br>
>>><br>
>>> Are you questioning the interpolated terrain height is wrong?<br>
>>> Since your angle is 90degree, basically west-east cross section. It is very easy to check the terrain height yourself to see if the interpolated terrain height by wrf_CrossSection_add_smooth_terrain4.ncl is reasonable.<br>
>>><br>
>>> Cheers!<br>
>>> Xiaoming<br>
>>><br>
>>> ________________________________<br>
>>> Date: Sun, 22 May 2016 09:38:27 +0545<br>
>>> From: <a href="mailto:sangeetamaharjan@gmail.com">sangeetamaharjan@gmail.com</a><br>
>>> To: <a href="mailto:ncl-talk@ucar.edu">ncl-talk@ucar.edu</a><br>
>>> Subject: [ncl-talk] Managing terrain height in the script wrf_CrossSection_add_smooth_terrain4.ncl<br>
>>><br>
>>> Dear All,<br>
>>><br>
>>> I have used the wrf_CrossSection_add_smooth_terrain4.ncl to study distribution of TKE along the cross section. The problem is the height of terrain seems to lesser than the actual one. For example, the maximum terrain height with in the cross section has to be about 1900 meters but it is lesser by 300 meters in the plot generated by the script.<br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>> Please find the sample of plot showing the reduced terrain height for your kind reference in the attachment.<br>
>>><br>
>>> I would appreciate any insight to manage the terrain heights in the script.<br>
>>><br>
>>> Thanks & Regards.<br>
>>><br>
>>> Sang,<br>
>>><br>
>>> _______________________________________________ ncl-talk mailing list <a href="mailto:ncl-talk@ucar.edu">ncl-talk@ucar.edu</a> List instructions, subscriber options, unsubscribe: <a href="http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/ncl-talk" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/ncl-talk</a><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> ncl-talk mailing list<br>
>> <a href="mailto:ncl-talk@ucar.edu">ncl-talk@ucar.edu</a><br>
>> List instructions, subscriber options, unsubscribe:<br>
>> <a href="http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/ncl-talk" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/ncl-talk</a><br>
>><br>
><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>