<div dir="ltr"><div>method conserve will do what it says 'conserve' the overall mean. It will *not* preserve the min/max values.<br><br></div>method neareststod will get the nearest value to the target grid point. That may or may not be the the min or max value in the target grid box. <br><div><br><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Sha Feng <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:sfeng@mail.usf.edu" target="_blank">sfeng@mail.usf.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style="word-wrap:break-word">I was thinking "conserve" and "neareststod" . If "conserve" it not an option, how about "neareststod"? I couldn't find the description of this option on ESMF webpage. <div><br></div><div>Thanks,</div><div>-Sha</div><div><div class="h5"><div><br><div><div>On Nov 5, 2014, at 6:45 AM, Dennis Shea wrote:</div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><div>re: "<span style="font-family:LucidaSans">After the interpolation, I want to
largely keep the peak points in the source data (2D) in place instead of
being smoothed out as well as largely keep the total amount conserved"<br><br></span></div><span style="font-family:LucidaSans">I doubt this can be done by any of the available methods:<br></span><div><div><br>bilinear, finite element patch recovery or first-order conservative regridding<br><br><br></div></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 10:11 PM, Sha Feng <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:sfeng@mail.usf.edu" target="_blank">sfeng@mail.usf.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style="word-wrap:break-word"><div><font face="LucidaSans">Hi there, </font></div><span style="font-family:LucidaSans"><div><span style="font-family:LucidaSans"><br></span></div>I am trying to interpolate a regional 0.01 deg scattering-distributed filed (source) to a 1.3-km WRF domain (destination) using ESMF regridding tool but puzzled by what to be assigned to "InterpMethod" . After the interpolation, I want to largely keep the peak points in the source data (2D) in place instead of being smoothed out as well as largely keep the total amount conserved. Do you have suggestion for this purpose? </span><br style="font-family:LucidaSans"><br style="font-family:LucidaSans"><span style="font-family:LucidaSans">A reference would be much helpful as well if available. I couldn't find clear description in the ESMF_regridding.ncl code. </span><br style="font-family:LucidaSans"><br style="font-family:LucidaSans"><span style="font-family:LucidaSans">Thanks,</span><br style="font-family:LucidaSans"><span style="font-family:LucidaSans">-Sha</span></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>
ncl-talk mailing list<br>
List instructions, subscriber options, unsubscribe:<br>
<a href="http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/ncl-talk" target="_blank">http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/ncl-talk</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div></div></div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>