<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<font face="Times New Roman">Hi all,<br>
<br>
I'll look forward to the demo.<br>
<br>
thanks,<br>
Karl<br>
</font><br>
On 1/20/12 6:29 AM, Cinquini, Luca (3880) wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:92AC2EB0-B5B0-4888-B52F-E1550513E229@jpl.nasa.gov"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hi Stephen,
thanks for the matrix...
I would like to suggest that we start with a full demo of the P2P system on Tuesday. The gateway 2.0 demo took a full hour - we will try to make the P2P demo shorter, but if it ends up taking a full hour, we can always discuss the matrix at the next call.
thanks, Luca
On Jan 20, 2012, at 7:23 AM, Eric Nienhouse wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hi Stephen,
Thank you for this latest version of the matrix. It will be good to
discuss it further on Tuesday. I would like to understand the ranking
numbers and planned evaluation process and hope this is something we can
address on the call.
Attached is an update to the previous version I was just about to send
as your recent email arrived. Please note 4 highlighted rows. (2 fall
in the non-functional category.) I trust they can be incorporated and
discussed.
Indeed the CMIP5 system(s) are under continued development and
enhancement and the matrix inherently has some relation to the
architectural choices up to this point. Sticking with the current
replication section for the time being seems appropriate.
Thanks,
-Eric
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:stephen.pascoe@stfc.ac.uk">stephen.pascoe@stfc.ac.uk</a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
Dear all,
I have merged Luca's suggestions into the CMIP5 GUI requirements
matrix and reorganised it substantially. Apart from those items that
are architecture-specific I include most of them, sometimes under a
different section.
I'm aware there are some architectural assumptions embedded in this
sheet. For instance, there has been a recent discussion about whether
master/replica is the right model for depicting replicas. It's a pity
we're having this discussion now! For the moment I've kept the
replication section as-is.
All scores are my opinion based on variable information. Sometimes
I've assumed something works or is planned in P2P without verifying
it, sometimes I've assumed it doesn't after a quick test. Where there
is a "?" anywhere it would be really useful for the developers to
contribute. To this end I'd like to go through the sheet on Tuesday,
or make a start at least, so that I can clarify what some items mean.
I know a lot of water has flowed under the bridge since I started this
process. No matter what strategic decisions the CMIP5 cores centres
take on our future deployments I hope this matrix will be useful in
focusing on the core CMIP5 requirements.
Thanks,
Stephen.
---
Stephen Pascoe +44 (0)1235 445980
Centre of Environmental Data Archival
STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Harwell Oxford, Didcot OX11 0QX, UK
*From:* Pascoe, Stephen (STFC,RAL,RALSP)
*Sent:* 10 January 2012 14:32
*To:* <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:go-essp-tech@ucar.edu">go-essp-tech@ucar.edu</a>
*Subject:* CMIP5 Web interface requirements matrix
Dear all,
To help the CMIP5 centres plan our upgrade to the next major release
of the CMIP5 archive system BADC has been collating a
spreadsheet of web interface requirements with input from PCMDI, DKRZ
and MOHC (see attached). We hope to use this sheet as a tool to plan
migration of the CMIP5 web interface at the main CMIP5 centres: PCMDI,
BADC and DKRZ.
The sheet is still work in progress and there is lots to discuss and
clarify. I have begun to suggest scores for the three systems being
considered, Gateway 1.3.4, Gateway 2.0 and P2P, but these are
speculative at this stage, particularly for the P2P system with which
I have the least experience.
If there is time I'd like to briefly introduce the sheet at the
GO-ESSP telco today and schedule a time for a more thorough discussion.
Cheers,
Stephen.
---
Stephen Pascoe +44 (0)1235 445980
Centre of Environmental Data Archival
STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Harwell Oxford, Didcot OX11 0QX, UK
--
Scanned by iCritical.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
GO-ESSP-TECH mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:GO-ESSP-TECH@ucar.edu">GO-ESSP-TECH@ucar.edu</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/go-essp-tech">http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/go-essp-tech</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
<CMIP5_GUI_Requirements_v20120110_ejn.xlsx>_______________________________________________
GO-ESSP-TECH mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:GO-ESSP-TECH@ucar.edu">GO-ESSP-TECH@ucar.edu</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/go-essp-tech">http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/go-essp-tech</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
_______________________________________________
GO-ESSP-TECH mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:GO-ESSP-TECH@ucar.edu">GO-ESSP-TECH@ucar.edu</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/go-essp-tech">http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/go-essp-tech</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>