<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 12 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Consolas;
panose-1:2 11 6 9 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-GB" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Hi Luca,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">This is where deciding the scope of the matrix gets difficult. I can agree with some of your requirements but many seem too P2P focused to me. So I'll respond
point-by-point to your sheet soon but expect some push-back on what is in and out of scope. I'm not ready to relinquish control over this yet. No-one is completely neutral in this debate but someone has to hold the ring.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">We need to be focused on what this sheet is for. It is not for planning general ESGF development (at least not at this stage). It is for planning how we meet
the requirements for CMIP5. I.e. what we promised WGCM and what users are asking for. In the short term this sheet is to help us fix the terrible usability and performance problems we have. There are 2 potential solutions and we need to decide which to
deploy in the short/medium and long term. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">I think it is vital that we stick to functional requirements as far as possible. Some non-functional requirements are needed, like consistency and performance,
but having too many subjective non-functional requirements will make the matrix useless. I actually resisted including sections 12 and 13 (deployment and development) because I think they are subjective and difficult to agree on. However, others were very
keen to have them in so I included them. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">I'll get back to you in more detail asap.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Stephen.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Consolas;color:#1F497D">---<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Consolas;color:#1F497D">Stephen Pascoe +44 (0)1235 445980<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Consolas;color:#1F497D">Centre of Environmental Data Archival<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Consolas;color:#1F497D">STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Harwell Oxford, Didcot OX11 0QX, UK<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">From:</span></b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif""> Cinquini, Luca (3880) [mailto:Luca.Cinquini@jpl.nasa.gov]
<br>
<b>Sent:</b> 10 January 2012 19:06<br>
<b>To:</b> V Balaji<br>
<b>Cc:</b> Pascoe, Stephen (STFC,RAL,RALSP); go-essp-tech@ucar.edu<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [Go-essp-tech] CMIP5 Web interface requirements matrix<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><span style="font-size:10.0pt">Hi Stephen, Balaj et all,<br>
I added many more requirements to Stephen's original spreadsheet, including IPSL's download tool. I marked the spreadsheet with tomorrow's date to indicate it's an updated version.<br>
thanks, Luca<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><span style="font-size:10.0pt"><br>
<br>
<br>
On Jan 10, 2012, at 10:30 AM, V Balaji wrote:<br>
<br>
> Following up on the discussion of command line tools on this call, I<br>
> would like to propose adding Sebastien's synchro_data to the list of<br>
> gateways!<br>
> <br>
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Cinquini, Luca (3880)<br>
> <Luca.Cinquini@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:<br>
>> Hi Stephen,<br>
>> so what is the process for adding requirements to this list ? As I<br>
>> mentioned, there are many other items that should be part of a full<br>
>> evaluation. Should I just send an update version to your list ?<br>
>> thanks, Luca<br>
>> <br>
>> On Jan 10, 2012, at 9:31 AM, <stephen.pascoe@stfc.ac.uk><br>
>> <stephen.pascoe@stfc.ac.uk> wrote:<br>
>> <br>
>> In response to a query on the telco: the sheet I sent is the latest,<br>
>> although I have not included notes from MOHC and DKRZ therefore the size of<br>
>> many cells are smaller. I was thinking we should make a clean start with<br>
>> this wider release of the sheet. Also the snazzy colour coding hasn't<br>
>> survived translation from OpenOffice to XLS but that's not important.<br>
>> <br>
>> Stephen.<br>
>> <br>
>> ---<br>
>> Stephen Pascoe +44 (0)1235 445980<br>
>> Centre of Environmental Data Archival<br>
>> STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Harwell Oxford, Didcot OX11 0QX, UK<br>
>> <br>
>> From: Pascoe, Stephen (STFC,RAL,RALSP)<br>
>> Sent: 10 January 2012 14:32<br>
>> To: go-essp-tech@ucar.edu<br>
>> Subject: CMIP5 Web interface requirements matrix<br>
>> <br>
>> Dear all,<br>
>> <br>
>> To help the CMIP5 centres plan our upgrade to the next major release of the<br>
>> CMIP5 archive system BADC has been collating a<br>
>> spreadsheet of web interface requirements with input from PCMDI, DKRZ and<br>
>> MOHC (see attached). We hope to use this sheet as a tool to plan migration<br>
>> of the CMIP5 web interface at the main CMIP5 centres: PCMDI, BADC and DKRZ.<br>
>> <br>
>> The sheet is still work in progress and there is lots to discuss and<br>
>> clarify. I have begun to suggest scores for the three systems being<br>
>> considered, Gateway 1.3.4, Gateway 2.0 and P2P, but these are speculative at<br>
>> this stage, particularly for the P2P system with which I have the least<br>
>> experience.<br>
>> <br>
>> If there is time I'd like to briefly introduce the sheet at the GO-ESSP<br>
>> telco today and schedule a time for a more thorough discussion.<br>
>> <br>
>> Cheers,<br>
>> Stephen.<br>
>> <br>
>> ---<br>
>> Stephen Pascoe +44 (0)1235 445980<br>
>> Centre of Environmental Data Archival<br>
>> STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Harwell Oxford, Didcot OX11 0QX, UK<br>
>> <br>
>> <br>
>> --<br>
>> Scanned by iCritical.<br>
>> <br>
>> <br>
>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> GO-ESSP-TECH mailing list<br>
>> GO-ESSP-TECH@ucar.edu<br>
>> <a href="http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/go-essp-tech">http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/go-essp-tech</a><br>
>> <br>
>> <br>
>> <br>
>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> GO-ESSP-TECH mailing list<br>
>> GO-ESSP-TECH@ucar.edu<br>
>> <a href="http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/go-essp-tech">http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/go-essp-tech</a><br>
>> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> -- <br>
> <br>
> V. Balaji Office: +1-609-452-6516<br>
> Head, Modeling Systems Group, GFDL Home: +1-212-253-6662<br>
> Princeton University Email: v.balaji@noaa.gov<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br><p>--
<BR>Scanned by iCritical.
</p>
<br></body>
</html>