<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Can you tell us about the wide-area transfer performance with Unidata
LDM compared to GridFTP server based transfers?<br>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- Alex
</pre>
<br>
On 6/4/10 3:39 AM, <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:martin.juckes@stfc.ac.uk">martin.juckes@stfc.ac.uk</a> wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:EB1E7CB92F5B35459E0B926D2A614DB605E09DBD@EXCHANGE19.fed.cclrc.ac.uk"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type"
content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 12 (filtered medium)">
<style>
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;}
@page Section1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.Section1
{page:Section1;}
-->
</style>
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
<div class="Section1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><font face="Calibri" size="2"><span
style="font-size: 11pt;">Hello
all,<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font face="Calibri" size="2"><span
style="font-size: 11pt;"><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font face="Calibri" size="2"><span
style="font-size: 11pt;">There
may be a simple answer to this, but is there a reason why we shouldn’t
use the Unidata Local Data Manager (LDM) for bulk data movement within
the
CMIP5 distributed archive? It appears to have a lot of good features
built in
to verify success of data transfer between sites, and runs successfully
at many
operational sites. This would simplify the work flow, since all the
complexity
of the site to site transfers would be dealt with by a tried and tested
system,<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font face="Calibri" size="2"><span
style="font-size: 11pt;"><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font face="Calibri" size="2"><span
style="font-size: 11pt;">Cheers,<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><font face="Calibri" size="2"><span
style="font-size: 11pt;">Martin
<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
</div>
<br>
<p>-- <br>
Scanned by iCritical.
</p>
<br>
<pre wrap="">
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
_______________________________________________
GO-ESSP-TECH mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:GO-ESSP-TECH@ucar.edu">GO-ESSP-TECH@ucar.edu</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/go-essp-tech">http://mailman.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/go-essp-tech</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>