<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1">
<title></title>
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
All,<br>
<br>
I'm in agreement with Bryan and Balaji.<br>
<br>
Having missed the Princeton meeting and avoided the recent email
discussions I'd like to take a moment to congratulate the group on
coming to consensus on the trinity of acronym--logo--mission
statement. Reaching consensus on such fundamental and personal taste
driven items can be difficult and the results often show it. The fact
that I am very satisfied with the results without having participated
speaks well of the commonly held vision. Kudos to all who made it
happen.<br>
<br>
I look forward to more active participation on my part as we move into
the nitty gritty of software interoperability now that we appear to
have vision statement interoperability under wraps.<br>
<br>
Cheers to all,<br>
<br>
<br>
-- Jon<br>
<br>
V. Balaji wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="midPine.LNX.4.44.0407191219470.2217-100000@vb">
<pre wrap="">Bryan Lawrence writes:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Wrt Glenn's suggested modifications: I like the second (adding scientists and
data providers to the list ... I would wouldn't I :-), but not the first. I
think "Internet" is less politically charged, and is more inclusive than
"grid" ...
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
What he said!
(I'm glad I saw Bryan's mail before saying the same thing... "grid"
can raise hackles.)
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>