CEDAR email: PhD studentships in Germany; CEDAR-GEM workshop calls for participation

Barbara Emery emery at ucar.edu
Tue Jun 21 19:25:20 MDT 2011


This is a generic mailing to the CEDAR community sent 20 June 2011.
Meetings and jobs are listed at http://cedarweb.hao.ucar.edu under
'Community' as 'Calendar of Meetings' and 'CEDAR related opportunities'.
CEDAR email messages are under 'Community' as 'CEDAR email Newsletters'.
All are in 'Quick Links' on the main page.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) PhD Studentships in Solar System Science at the Max Planck Institute for 
Solar System Research in Katlenburg-Lindau and the Universities of Goettingen 
and Braunschweig, Germany.
 From Dieter Schmitt <info at solar-system-school.de>.
See also http://www.solar-system-school.de.

(2) CEDAR-GEM individual workshops, 26 June-01 July 2011, Santa Fe, NM, 
http://cedarweb.hao.ucar.edu/wiki/index.php/2011_Workshop:Main.
*(a)Plasmasphere-Magnetosphere Interactions (PMI) Sessions at CEDAR/GEM,
From:  Phil Erickson <pje at haystack.mit.edu>.
*(b)High Speed Streams and Their Geospace and Atmosphere Consequences,
From: Janet Kozyra <jukozyra at umich.edu>.
*(c)Electrodynamic Coupling of the Ionosphere and Magnetosphere at Middle and 
Low Latitudes,
From: Naomi Maruyama <Naomi.Maruyama at noaa.gov>.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) PhD Studentships in Solar System Science at the Max Planck Institute for 
Solar System Research in Katlenburg-Lindau and the Universities of Goettingen 
and Braunschweig, Germany.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
 From Dieter Schmitt <info at solar-system-school.de>.

Dear colleague,

I would like to draw your attention to the "International Max Planck
Research School on Physical Processes in the Solar System and Beyond"
at the Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research in Katlenburg-Lindau
and the Universities of Goettingen and Braunschweig, Germany.

The school offers excellent research possibilities for students to obtain
a PhD degree in a 3-years graduate program.

The program covers the full range of physics inherent in the field of
solar system science from geophysics and planetary science to solar physics
as well as the underlying fundamental physics.

Applications for the program are open to highly-qualified and well-motivated
students from all countries. A prerequisite is a diploma or master of science
degree in physics or a related field, including a corresponding thesis.
Proficiency in English is required.

The next PhD program will start in January 2012, review of application begins
on 1 August 2011. Successful applicants will receive adequate financial support.

The application documents should include a CV, the filled application form
(see web page), copies of university certificates and two letters of
recommendation. The application can be send either by mail or by email
(preferentially one attachment in pdf format) to the address given below.

For details on the IMPRS program and the application procedure, please visit
http://www.solar-system-school.de or email to info at solar-system-school.de

We would very much appreciate if you post this information and the attached
poster at your institute
and inform your colleagues and especially potentially
interested students.

With kind regards,

Dieter Schmitt

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) CEDAR-GEM individual workshops, 26 June-01 July 2011, Santa Fe, NM, 
http://cedarweb.hao.ucar.edu/wiki/index.php/2011_Workshop:Main.
*(a)Plasmasphere-Magnetosphere Interactions (PMI) Sessions at CEDAR/GEM
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
From:  Phil Erickson <pje at haystack.mit.edu>.

Call for Participation:

*Session I:   (Mon 27 Jun,  4 -  6 pm)
*Session II:  (Tue 28 Jun, 10 - 12 am)
*Session III: "M-I Coupling within Plasmasphere Boundary Layer"
JOINT WITH CEDAR.  (Tue 28 Jun, 1:30-3:30p)

From:  Jerry Goldstein <jgoldstein AT swri.edu>,
Maria Spasojevic <mariaspasojevic AT stanford.edu>,
Joe Borovksy <jborovsky at lanl.gov>,
Phil Erickson <pje at haystack.mit.edu>

GENERAL CALL:
The GEM PMI focus group would like to invite presentation and participation in 
three sessions at this year's GEM/CEDAR joint workshop.  The three sessions take 
place on Monday and Tuesday, as listed above.  Session III is devoted especially 
to joint GEM/CEDAR topics.  We also invite active participation and 
presentations of new results by members of the LSW FST on the Plasmasphere. 
Please e-mail us for a speaking slot as soon as possible.

SCIENCE TOPICS:

1) Modeling plasmaspheric density:  formation, evolution, morphology. 
Observations in support of models, and model-data comparisons.  What are the 
radial, MLT, and field-aligned structures?  What evidence is there for 
interhemispheric asymmetries?

2) The inner magnetospheric electric field:  global modeling, observations, and 
impact.

3) Plasmaspheric plume density distribution.  How well do plasmaspheric drainage 
plumes map to ionospheric SED plumes moving westward?  What is the altitude and 
temporal signature as we move from low to mid to high latitudes?  What creates 
the "lumpy" structure within plumes, and how does this structure evolve?  Is the 
plasma inside late-storm plumes from the magnetosphere, or outflow from a 
hot-ionosphere high-latitude source?  Where are the gaps in understanding?

4) PBL electric field variability.  What is the altitude dependence of the 
variability and what implications does this have for field-aligned currents and 
the scaling of the magnetic field mapping function / electric field structuring? 
  Do we have enough empirical evidence to make a statement and can data-guided 
models help?

5) Plasmapause location and structure.  How do ionospheric and magnetospheric 
people locate the plasmapause / PBL?  Are these compatible? What forms the 
structure seen on the PBL inner edge?

6) Wave/particle interactions and macroscale instabilities in the PBL.  Where 
are these located (in plasmasphere, in ducts, on plasmapause, within plume, ..)? 
  Where do they have an impact on particle trajectories through scattering or 
anomalous heating?

7) Conductivity control of PBL electrodynamics.  How is the coupled electric 
field on PBL field lines affected by ionospheric conductivity in either or both 
hemispheres?


WANT TO SPEAK?
Requests for speaking slots, ideas, comments, or questions:

Jerry Goldstein <jgoldstein AT swri.edu>,  Maria Spasojevic <mariaspasojevic AT 
stanford.edu>,  Joe Borovksy <jborovsky at lanl.gov>, Phil Erickson 
<pje at haystack.mit.edu>

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) CEDAR-GEM individual workshops, 26 June-01 July 2011, Santa Fe, NM, 
http://cedarweb.hao.ucar.edu/wiki/index.php/2011_Workshop:Main.
*(b)High Speed Streams and Their Geospace and Atmosphere Consequences,
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

*Joint CEDAR-GEM Workshop:  30 June 2011, Time:  Session 1  1330-1530 UT, 
Session 2  1600-1800 UT
*Conveners:  Janet Kozyra <jukozyra at umich.edu> and Richard Thorne 
<rmt at atmos.ucla.edu>,
*URL for Workshop: 
http://cedarweb.hao.ucar.edu/wiki/index.php/2011_Workshop:High_Speed_Stream_Driving_of_Geospace

Invitation to Participate:Please come and participate in a multi-disciplinary 
discussion of the response of geospace and
the atmosphere to high speed streams, both in general and as observed during the 
recent unusual
solar minimum. All are welcome!
* Speakers (listed below) have been invited to introduce new findings, the 
questions they raise, and possible consequences in other geospace regions.
* We are very interested in information about additional features in geospace 
during high-speed streams.  Please let the conveners know if you have 1-2 slides 
to present that raise new issues.
* We are hoping to take advantage of the unique environment that the joint 
CEDAR-GEM meeting provides to identify the signatures of related processes in 
different regions.

Please come and add your expertise to the mix in the joint workshop.  Workshop 
Description:This workshop addresses the impacts of high speed streams on the 
development of auroral activity,
radiation belt enhancements, inner magnetosphere-subauroral response, and 
atmospheric
perturbations. A particular sub-focus is to explore the changes in the 
geospace-atmosphere
response in the recent unusual solar minimum interval due to the combination of 
strong and
long-lasting high speed streams, the lowest average IMF and solar wind densities 
ever recorded
at 1 AU, and the lowest solar EUV fluxes in three solar cycles, placing system 
responses into a
backdrop of tenuous ionospheric densities and low conductivities.

<b>Draft Agenda</b>

<b>30 June 2011, Session 1   Magnetic Activity during HSS </b>
*1330     Robert McPherron  -- Solar wind - magnetosphere coupling during 
             high speed streams,  in the recent solar minimum, and in the 
                preceding solar minimum
*1350     Raluca Ilie - periodicities in the solar wind and magnetosphere during 
                    HSS
*1410     Vania Jordanova - ring current dynamics during high speed streams
*1430     Jeff Thayer  - CIR/HSS impact on the thermosphere
*1450     Olga Verkhoglyadova Ð Ionospheric TEC and thermospheric 
      emission dynamics during HSS
*1510     Yue Deng - Joule heating and 9-day periodicity of HSS

<b>30 June 2011, Session 2      Radiation Belts and HSS</b>

*1600     Joe Borovsky - Radiation belts during weak high speed streams in 
             2006-2007
*1620     Wen Li - Chorus waves seen on THEMIS during high speed streams   High 
Speed Stream Effects in the Atmosphere-Ionosphere & Consequences
*640     Sharon Vadas - Differences in propagation and dissipation of gravity 
                waves during SC24
*1700     John Emmert - Causes and consequencesÊof low thermospheric 
       densities this minimum
*1720     Stan Solomon:  Upper atmosphere and ionosphere at Solar Minimum
*1740-1800 Summary, Discussion, and 1-2 Slide Contributions from Participants

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) CEDAR-GEM individual workshops, 26 June-01 July 2011, Santa Fe, NM, 
http://cedarweb.hao.ucar.edu/wiki/index.php/2011_Workshop:Main.
*(c)Electrodynamic Coupling of the Ionosphere and Magnetosphere at Middle and 
Low Latitudes,
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Naomi Maruyama <Naomi.Maruyama at noaa.gov>

Session: Mon 27 Jun, 1330-1530

Room: Convention Center O'Keefe+Milagro

Conveners:
Bela Fejer <bela.fejer at usu.edu>,
Thomas Immel <immel at ssl.berkeley.edu>,
Stanislav Sazykin <sazykin at rice.edu>,
Naomi Maruyama <naomi.maruyama at noaa.gov>

We would like to invite presentations and participation in this session at the 
GEM-CEDAR joint workshop. The session description and a list of science 
questions are given below. The format of the presentations is informal with 
several slides and we would like to encourage science discussions.
If you are interested to give a talk in the session, please let us know.

<b>Session Description:</b>

In the last decade, there have been many new development in understanding the 
electrodynamic coupling of the inner magnetosphere with the middle and low 
latitude I-T system. One of the great achievements was the identification and 
explanation of common magnetic-storm processes in plasmaspheric and ionospheric 
data and images, and the realization that disturbance dynamo and prompt 
penetration electric fields are not independent but interact with each other 
non-linearly. New developments continue to highlight the coupled nature of the 
system during quiet times as well as in response to magnetic storms. Significant 
gaps in our understanding still exist and lie in the need to quantify the 
various sources of electrodynamic variability at mid and low latitudes and the 
interactions and feedback between them. For instance, during quiet times, 
fluctuating winds in the thermosphere from sources in the lower atmosphere are 
likely to compete with fluctuation of magnetospheric sources, both in terms of 
driving winds and in imposing modest penetration electric fields. These sources 
of quiet-time fluctuations in the fields, render it extremely difficult to 
separate storm from quiet, since the background from one day to the next can be 
50% of the signal. During storms the magnetospheric sources tends to dominate 
but lack of knowledge in the uncertainty in the quiet background can confuse 
interpretation of the storm response. This workshop is designed to bring 
together the CEDAR and GEM experts in the sources of mid and low latitude 
electrodynamics from the inner magnetosphere, thermospheric wind dynamo, and 
forcing from the lower atmosphere.

New science questions to lead discussions:

1) Response of low and mid-latitude ionosphere to penetrating magnetospheric 
fields vs. disturbance dynamo.
During a storm, the effects of both penetrating magnetospheric fields and 
disturbance dynamo fields drive changes in the ionosphere. What's typical, 
what's not? Does the F-layer go up or down, at what local times and for how long 
after storm onset? During disturbances, can the effects be reasonably separated 
or predicted? Do the responses depend on solar flux conditions?

2) Contribution of magnetospheric sources to quiet-time variability at low and 
mid latitudes.
During periods of low geomagnetic activity, the ionosphere continues to exhibit 
large variability. Is this due only to sources such as tropospheric forcing, or 
is the ionosphere more susceptible to forcing from magnetospheric sources, owing 
to the low ionospheric/magnetospheric densities of recent solar minimum conditions?

3) Storm-time wind dynamo electric fields in the inner magnetosphere.
The thermospheric winds that develop during geomagnetic storms drive electric 
fields that have a profound effect on the ionosphere. This disturbance dynamo 
develops after storm onset and persists for many hours after storm drivers 
lessen. These storm-time fields develop on magnetic L-shells that are usually 
occupied by cold plasma, but stripped of that during storms. What do the storm 
time dynamo electric fields look like from the point of view of the inner 
magnetosphere? Are these important for post-storm plasmaspheric dynamics?

-----------------------------------------------------------------------


More information about the Cedar_email mailing list